俱舍論疏 18.18

18.18

「論曰至言無威故」，明能破人也。《正理》四十三云「要大比丘，必非在家、比丘尼等，以彼依止無威德故。唯見行人非愛行者，以惡意樂極堅深故，於染、淨品俱躁動故。」《婆沙》一百一十六大意亦同。

[On the passage of the] treatise, "[The commentary] says ... because their words lack authority": This clarifies the person who causes the schism. Fascicle 43 of the Nyāyānusāra says: "It must be a senior monk (mahābhikṣu); it is definitely not a householder, a nun (bhikṣuṇī), or the like, because their basis lacks majesty and virtue. It is only one whose conduct is based on [wrong] views (dṛṣṭicarita), not one whose conduct is based on desire (tṛṣṇācarita), because their unwholesome resolve is exceedingly firm and deep, and because they are agitated regarding both defiled and pure categories." Fascicle 116 of the Vibhāṣā is also of the same general meaning.