俱舍論疏 19.207

19.207

論「先軌範師至是不善性」，敘經部釋。經部我見通分別起及俱生，如禽獸等無有分別。分別起者是不善，俱生者是無記，與大乘同。有部宗，我見唯有分別起，無俱生。無分別者，如禽獸等。執自、他者，是不染無知，非我見也。

The Śāstra states: "Former masters... is unwholesome in nature." This recounts the Sautrāntika explanation. For the Sautrāntikas, the view of self encompasses both conceptually arisen (vikalpita) and innate (sahaja); animals and the like have no conceptualization. The conceptually arisen one is unwholesome, and the innate one is indeterminate, which is the same as the Mahāyāna. In the Sarvāstivāda school, the view of self is solely conceptually arisen and not innate. That which is devoid of conceptualization, as in animals and the like, grasping at self and other, is non-defiled ignorance (akliṣṭāvidyā), not the view of self.