Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

俱舍論疏 2.200

俱舍論疏 2.200

Language
Classical Chinese

2.200

論「云何三根至名取至境」,問也。既不相觸,如何無間生即名為至?

On the Śāstra's statement: "How are the three faculties [...] called grasping contiguous objects?": this is a question. Since they do not touch, how does arising without interval constitute being contiguous?

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Translations (1)