俱舍論疏 24.149
俱舍論疏 24.149
- Language
- Classical Chinese
24.149
論「此證非理至不成惑故」，論主破也。此因不定，亦有共許無有二得煩惱不起。
On the Śāstra's statement: "This proof is illogical up to because defilements are not established": The author of the Śāstra refutes it. This reason is inconclusive (anaikāntika), for it is also mutually accepted that even when neither of the two possessions is present, afflictions do not arise.
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation