俱舍論疏 24.86

24.86

論「有餘師言至感五淨居」，敘異說。由信增故感初淨居，乃至由慧增故感後淨居。《正理論》云「感五淨居，為由業力？為雜修力？若是業力，雜修靜慮則為唐捐。若雜修力，與《品類足》所說相違，如彼論說『雜修靜慮及由業故生淨居天。諸所有處等名非異生法，乃至此中決定俱由二力，以隨闕一不生彼故。』」

The passage of the treatise starting with "Other masters say... cause the retribution of the five Pure Abodes" recounts alternative explanations: due to the predominance of faith, one receives retribution in the first Pure Abode, up to: due to the predominance of wisdom, one receives retribution in the last Pure Abode. The Nyāyānusāra states: "Is the retribution of the five Pure Abodes due to the power of karma, or due to the power of compounding cultivation? If it is the power of karma, compounding the cultivation of dhyāna would be in vain. If it is the power of compounding cultivation, it contradicts what is stated in the Prakaraṇapāda; as that treatise states: 'Through compounding the cultivation of dhyāna and by karma, one is born in the Pure Abode heavens. All the stations and so on are named dharmas not of ordinary worldlings, up to: here, it is definitely due to both powers, because if either one is lacking, one is not born there.'"