俱舍論疏 26.125

26.125

論「或如契經至亦當變異有」，更引經釋四欲別。「決定有」者，決定有我體故。「如是有」者，執我如是由婆羅門等有。「變異有」者，謂從小至大等有。「執我現有」者，計我現在有。「執我現無」者，執於現在歸斷滅故。餘文可解。雖有當別不同，竝准此釋。

The Śāstra states: "Or as a sūtra says... will also exist transformed": this further cites a sūtra to explain the distinctions among the four cravings. "Definitely exists" means that the entity of the self definitely exists. "Exists like this" means clinging that the self exists like this as a Brahmin, etc. "Exists transformed" means existing from small to large, and so forth. "Clinging that the self exists at present" means conceiving that the self exists in the present. "Clinging that the self does not exist at present" means clinging that in the present it reduces to annihilation. The remaining text is comprehensible. Although there are differences regarding future distinctions, they should all be interpreted according to this.