俱舍論疏 26.25

26.25

論「又法、類品至為所緣故」，明法、類智不相緣也。以類分智，非欲道故，法智不緣；以法分智，非上道故，類智不緣。雖滅、道法智亦治上修惑，非全分故，類智不緣。

Regarding the verse-text, 'Furthermore, the categories of dharma and inductive ... because of their objects': this explains that dharma-knowledge and inductive knowledge do not take each other as objects. Because the category of inductive knowledge is not the path of the desire realm, dharma-knowledge does not take it as an object; because the category of dharma-knowledge is not the path of the higher realms, inductive knowledge does not take it as an object. Although the dharma-knowledges of cessation and the path also remedy the higher defilements abandoned through cultivation, they are not of the complete division; hence inductive knowledge does not take them as objects.