俱舍論疏 26.42

26.42

論「二對治故至欲、上界故」，第二對治故立法、類智。對治欲界非法，故名法智。對治上界非法，亦應名法智。不可重名法智，但可名類，以是對治非法類故。

On the Śāstra's statement: "Second, because of antidotes [...] because of the desire realm and the higher realms": second, the knowledges of phenomena and concordance are established on account of antidotes. Because it is the antidote to non-Dharma of the desire realm, it is named the knowledge of phenomena. As the antidote to non-Dharma of the higher realms, it should also be named the knowledge of phenomena; but it cannot be redundantly named the knowledge of phenomena, and can only be named 'concordance' (anvaya), because it is concordant with the antidote to non-Dharma.