俱舍論疏 26.7

26.7

論「所餘皆通至推度性故」，明所餘智皆通智、見。「已斷自疑」，故是智攝。「推度性故」，故名為見。非初見故，不名為忍。

Regarding the verse-text, 'All the remainder are common to both ... because of their deliberative nature': this explains that all remaining knowledges are common to both knowledge and view. Because 'their own doubts have already been severed', they are subsumed under knowledge; because 'they are of a deliberative nature', they are named views. Because they are not the initial observation, they are not named receptivities.