俱舍論疏 26.86

26.86

論「豈修覺支有散別理」，有部難也。豈修覺支有散別修引經為難。若有別修，可有修三不修三別。既無別修之理，如何有修、不修者？

On the Śāstra's statement: "Could it be that the cultivation of the limbs of awakening has any principle of distinct separation?": the Sarvāstivādins object. Could cultivating the limbs of awakening involve cultivating them separately? They cite the sūtra to object: if there were separate cultivation, there could be the distinction of cultivating three and not cultivating three. Since there is no principle of separate cultivation, how could there be cultivating and not cultivating?