俱舍論疏 27.104

27.104

論「此四所緣至如無諍說」，明與無諍有同異也。《婆沙》一百八十云「世者皆墮三世。法、辨二無礙解緣三世。詞無礙解，過去緣過去、現在緣現在，未來生者緣未來，不生緣三世。有說：法與詞同。有說：法、詞、辨三無礙解，過去、現在緣過去，未來緣三世。義無礙解，或有欲令唯緣離世，或有欲令緣三世及離世。」然無評文。

The Śāstra states: "The objects of these four up to as explained for the absence of contention," clarifying similarities and differences with the absence of contention. The Vibhāṣā, scroll 180, says: "As for the time periods, all fall within the three time periods. The two unobstructed understandings of phenomena and eloquence take the three time periods as object. As for the unobstructed understanding of etymology, past takes the past as object, present takes the present as object, that which will arise in the future takes the future as object, and that which will not arise takes the three time periods as object. Some say: phenomena is identical to etymology. Some say: the three unobstructed understandings of phenomena, etymology, and eloquence, when past and present, take the past as object, and when future, take the three time periods as object. As for the unobstructed understanding of meaning, some maintain that it takes only that which transcends the time periods as object, while some maintain that it takes the three time periods and that which transcends the time periods as object." However, there is no evaluative statement.