俱舍論疏 28.115

28.115

論「有餘於此至唯說身故」，經部正經文也。是汝有部增足心字。所以得知？餘部經中無心字故。《正理論》云「何緣不許餘部契經？有餘於彼削除心字，以契經說第二定等無餘識身，心一趣故。若固說彼有身受樂，與理相違。如後當辨。」

On the treatise passage: "Others in this matter [...] because it speaks only of body": the Sautrāntika corrects the sūtra text. It is your Sarvāstivāda school that added the word "mental." How is this known? Because in the sūtras of other schools, the word "mental" is absent. The Nyāyānusāra states: "For what reason are the sūtras of other schools rejected? Others deleted the word 'mental' from them, because the sūtras state that in the second absorption and above there are no other consciousness-bodies, since the mind has a single orientation. If one stubbornly says that there is bodily pleasurable feeling in them, it contradicts reasoning. This will be analyzed later."