俱舍論疏 29.116

29.116

論「如是謬言至亦同此失」，自下第二破依蘊也。汝言依蘊者，為攬諸蘊為依？為因諸蘊名依？二俱有過，皆違自宗過。攬蘊即是假，因蘊即無常。

On the Śāstra's statement: "Such erroneous speech […] likewise shares this fault": From here below is the second part, refuting 'dependent on the aggregates'. When you say 'dependent on the aggregates', do you mean 'dependent' by gathering the aggregates together? Or do you call it 'dependent' by being caused by the aggregates? Both have faults, and both incur the fault of contradicting your own school. Gathering the aggregates makes it nominal; being caused by the aggregates makes it impermanent.