俱舍論疏 29.134

29.134

論「故彼所言至理不成立」，總結火依薪喻，進退推徵理不成立。論「又彼若許至及非第五故」，第四難轉計不可說一異也。

On the Śāstra's statement: "Therefore what they say […] cannot be established by reason": This concludes that the simile of fire dependent on fuel cannot be established by reason when pushed and investigated forward and backward. On the Śāstra's statement: "Moreover, if they admit […] and because it is not the fifth": This is the fourth challenge, refuting the shifted position that identity and difference are ineffable.