俱舍論疏 29.144

29.144

論「若爾至與觸一異」，論主難成假也。因知四境，知有假乳。乳與四境非一非異，四境是實而乳是假。因識色等而知於我，我應是假。

On the Śāstra's statement: "If so, […] identical with or different from touch": The author challenges them, establishing nominality. Because of knowing the four sense objects, one knows that there is nominal milk. Milk is neither identical with nor different from the four sense objects; the four sense objects are real while milk is nominal. Since the self is known through cognising form and the rest, the self must be nominal.