俱舍論疏 30.157

30.157

論「此證非理至但有虛言」，論主破外證也。外執念等德句義攝，體皆非實，依餘實法。我宗不許，亦不極成。我宗許念等有別實體性，皆名實故。我宗經說六實物名沙門果故。六實即是無漏五蘊并擇滅也。

On the Śāstra's statement: "This proof is illogical [...] there are only empty words": The author of the treatise refutes the opponent's proof. The opponents maintain that mindfulness and so forth are subsumed under the category of qualities, that their essence is entirely non-substantial, and that they rely on other substantial phenomena. Our school does not accept this, nor is it universally established. Our school accepts that mindfulness and so forth possess distinct substantial natures, and all are called substantial. For our school's sūtra states that six substantial entities are called the fruits of asceticism (śrāmaṇyaphala); the six substantial entities are the five uncontaminated aggregates along with analytical cessation (pratisaṃkhyānirodha).