俱舍論疏 30.172

30.172

論「若無我體誰之我執」，外道難也。若有我體，我執屬我名相屬性。若無我體，我執屬誰名相屬性？

On the Śāstra's statement, "If there is no entity of a self, whose grasping of a self is it?": the non-Buddhist objects. If there were an entity of a self, the grasping of a self belonging to the self would be called its connected nature; if there is no entity of a self, to whom does the grasping of a self belong so as to be called its connected nature?