俱舍論疏 30.25

30.25

論「又汝所引至為喻不成」，論主兩關破前引喻也。若說是我，即不極成，我不許故。若是心等，又念念滅，新新生故。取捨不成，身如心等。又如明等與身有異，蘊亦應異補特伽羅。老、病二身前後各別，皆無取捨。若同數論說有轉變，如前已破。

On the Śāstra's statement: "Furthermore, the examples you cite [...] fail to serve as analogies": The author of the Śāstra refutes the previously cited analogies on two fronts. If they are said to be the self, that is not established, for I do not accept it. If they are the mind and so forth, they perish moment by moment, arising ever anew; thus taking on and casting off are not established, and the body is like the mind and so forth. Furthermore, just as the Vedas and so forth are different from the body, the aggregates should also be different from the pudgala. The aged and diseased bodies are distinct before and after; in neither is there taking on or casting off. If you agree with the Sāṃkhya in saying there is transformation, that has already been refuted above.