俱舍論疏 4.72

4.72

論「若爾不應至皆互相應」，外重難也。一有警覺、一無警覺，二既有殊，如何同緣一境？又若有警覺與無警覺二得相應，亦應一切貪、無貪等皆互相應。

The Treatise states: "If so, they should not [...] would all be conjoined with each other." The opponent objects again: One has alertness and one lacks alertness; since the two are distinct, how can they grasp the same intentional object together? Furthermore, if having alertness and lacking alertness can be conjoined, then all greed, non-greed, and so forth should also be conjoined with each other.