俱舍論疏 5.201

5.201

論「雖了有為至有生等實物」，經部述經生等四相，雖不離有為，然不即彼。雖了有為色等自性，而不能了先無今有生、今有後大滅、相續之住相、差別之住異，仍未知彼體是有為，故非色等即有為相，然非離彼色等生有生等實物。

On the treatise passage: "Although one comprehends the conditioned … distinct real entities such as arising": the Sautrāntika explains that although the sūtra’s four characteristics of arising and the rest are not separate from the conditioned, they are not identical with it. Although one comprehends the intrinsic nature of conditioned matter and the like, if one fails to comprehend the arising of not having existed previously and now existing, the cessation of now existing and later non-existing, the staying-characteristic of continuity, and the decay-cum-alteration of distinction, one still does not know that their essence is conditioned. Therefore, matter and the like are not themselves the conditioned characteristics; yet neither are there real entities such as arising apart from that matter and the like.