俱舍論疏 5.248
俱舍論疏 5.248
- Language
- Classical Chinese
5.248
論「若此句義至別有實名」，自此已下經部師難有別名也。但由假音聲顯用已辨，因何計有離聲實名？
On the Śāstra's statement: "If this sentence's meaning [...] there is a separate real name": From this point onward, the Sautrāntika master refutes the existence of a separate name. Since the function is already accounted for through nominal vocal sound, why posit a real name separate from sound?
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation