俱舍論疏 6.129

6.129

論「此中同言至應知亦爾」，此釋同依。准此釋意，同所依者，是心、心所共一所依義，所緣亦爾。有人解前同一所依、同一所緣云：依雖有二只依一說，緣雖有多且依一說者，即違此文。然此頌中但言同依義通，准長行釋同一剎那。就剎那同中復有二種：一所依定同、二現起同。所依定同者，如一剎那眼通有三性識依。就染識中，通與貪、瞋等依。然此等法雖同一依，非相應也。故知雖同依一剎那眼根，亦非相應義，必須現起同一剎那方是相應。由此長行釋中云「謂若眼識，用此剎那眼根為依，相應受等。」亦即用此眼根為依，此據剎那現起為依。由如是義應作四句：有是同一依非同時等，謂三性識，同於一根以為依定，起時不同及境不定。二起時境等雖同，而所依異，如眾人觀月等。俱句可知。

The treatise says, "Here, the word 'same' [...] should also be understood in this way," which explains having the same basis. Following the meaning of this explanation, having the same basis means that mind and mental factors share a single basis; the object-support is also like this. Someone explained the earlier 'same basis and same object-support' by saying: 'Although there are two bases, it is spoken of relying on only one; although there are multiple object-supports, it is spoken of provisionally relying on only one'—this contradicts this text. However, the verse merely says 'same basis', the meaning of which is broad; according to the prose explanation, it means the same moment (kṣaṇa). Within having the same moment, there are again two kinds: first, definite identity of basis; second, simultaneous manifestation. As for definite identity of basis, for example, the eye in a single moment universally serves as a basis for consciousnesses of the three natures; within defiled consciousness, it universally serves as a basis for greed, anger, and so forth. Yet although these phenomena share the same basis, they are not associated. Therefore we know that even if they share the eye faculty of a single moment as a basis, it is still not the meaning of association; they must manifest simultaneously in the same moment to be associated. Therefore, the prose explanation says: "Namely, if eye-consciousness uses the eye faculty of this moment as a basis, the associated sensation and so forth" also use this eye faculty as a basis; this is said in terms of manifesting in a moment to serve as a basis. Based on this principle, a fourfold proposition should be made: there are those that have the same basis but not the same time, etc., referring to consciousnesses of the three natures having a fixed basis in the same faculty, while their times of arising differ and their objects are unfixed. Second, those whose times of arising, objects, etc., are the same, yet their bases are different, like many people looking at the moon, etc. The [both and neither] clauses can be understood.