俱舍論疏 6.204

6.204

論「有契經中至不障因性」，經部破也。無為為所緣緣，有經說故，我作此釋。不障礙因既無經說，因何得立而妄例我所緣緣也？

[When] the treatise [states]: "In a certain discourse ... the nature of non-obstruction as a cause," the Sautrāntika refutes them: "That the unconditioned is an objective condition is stated in a sūtra; thus I offer this explanation. Since there is no scriptural statement for a cause of non-obstruction, on what basis can it be established, such that you falsely analogize it to our objective condition?"