俱舍論疏 8.170

8.170

論「實有諸像至故不成喻」，此即略以二理破也。一像有不成、二非等不成。

On the passage in the śāstra from "Real reflections" to "therefore it does not constitute a valid analogy": This briefly refutes them through two logical reasons: first, that the existence of reflections is not established; second, that it is not established as being equivalent.