俱舍論頌疏論本 14.109

14.109

從此第六，明娶妻不犯，論云：「諸有先受近事律儀，後娶妻妾，於彼妻妾，先受戒時，得律儀不（問也）？理實應得，勿但於一分得別解脫律儀（答也）。若爾，云何後非犯戒（難也）？」頌曰：

From here, the sixth part explains that marrying a wife is not an infraction. The treatise says: "When someone who has previously undertaken the discipline of a lay follower subsequently marries wives and concubines, did he obtain the discipline with respect to those wives and concubines at the time of previously taking the precepts? (This is a question.) In principle, he should have obtained it, lest he obtain prātimokṣa discipline only with respect to a single part. (This is an answer.) If so, why is it not an infraction of the precepts later on? (This is an objection.)" The verse says: