俱舍論頌疏論本 2.62

2.62

不染非六生，色定非見斷者，此通外難，謂經部宗許異生性及招惡趣身、語業等是見所斷，謂得見道，彼異生等永不復生。既與見道極相違故，應見所斷。為答此難，故有斯頌。雖爾，此法定非見斷。略說非見斷，總有三種：一不染法，善、無記也；二非六生，謂五識也，不從第六意生，名非六生也；三者色法。此三種法定非見斷，非迷諦理親發起故，謂不染、非六生、非迷諦理，色法非見惑親發也。然異生性是不染污無記性攝。身、語惡業是色法故，故此二種非見所斷。

That 'the unsoiled, what is not born of the sixth, and matter are definitely not abandoned by seeing' resolves an objection from another school: the Sautrāntikas hold that the nature of an ordinary worldling (pṛthagjanatva) and physical and vocal karma that lead to bad destinies are abandoned by seeing, arguing that when one attains the path of seeing, that nature of an ordinary worldling and so forth never arise again; since they directly contradict the path of seeing, they should be abandoned by seeing. This verse was spoken to answer this objection. Even though this is so, these dharmas are definitely not abandoned by seeing. In brief, there are three types that are not abandoned by seeing: first, unsoiled dharmas, which are wholesome and neutral (avyākṛta); second, that which is not born of the sixth, which refers to the five consciousnesses, called 'not born of the sixth' because they do not arise from the sixth, the mental [consciousness]; third, material dharmas (rūpa). These three types of dharmas are definitely not abandoned by seeing because they are not directly generated by confusion regarding the principle of the truths. That is, the unsoiled and what is not born of the sixth are not confused regarding the principle of the truths, and material dharmas are not directly generated by delusions [abandoned by] seeing. Moreover, the nature of an ordinary worldling is subsumed under the unsoiled neutral nature. Because physical and vocal evil karma are material dharmas, these two kinds are not abandoned by seeing.