俱舍論頌疏論本 23.66

23.66

釋曰：除道類智，前十五心名為見道，於四諦理未見今見，見未曾見，故得見名。至道類智，無一諦理未見今見，如修曾見，故修道攝。問：「如道類忍是道諦理，此道類智緣道類忍，於道類忍未見今見，何故道類智非見道攝耶？」答：「此中約諦，不約剎那。雖於道類忍一剎那心未見今見，於上下八諦皆已曾見，故修道攝。如刈畦稻，唯餘一科，不可名為一畦未刈。」問：「忍於諦理未見今見，可名見道，中間七智已見今見，何緣七智亦見道攝？」答：「知諦未盡，中間起故，亦見道攝。」

The explanation states: Excluding the subsequent cognition of the path, the first fifteen mental moments are called the path of seeing, because one now sees what was not yet seen of the principles of the four truths; seeing what has not yet been seen, it therefore obtains the name 'seeing'. Reaching the subsequent cognition of the path, there is no principle of the truths that is now seen without having been seen before; like cultivation, one has already seen them, so it is subsumed under the path of cultivation. Question: "As the subsequent patience of the path is the principle of the truth of the path, and this subsequent cognition of the path takes the subsequent patience of the path as its object, one now sees the subsequent patience of the path without having seen it before; why then is the subsequent cognition of the path not subsumed under the path of seeing?" Answer: "Here it is determined by the truths, not by the moments. Although with respect to the single mental moment of the subsequent patience of the path one now sees what was not yet seen, with respect to the eight truths above and below, one has already seen them all; thus it is subsumed under the path of cultivation. It is like harvesting rice in a plot: when only a single clump remains, one cannot call it an unharvested plot." Question: "Patience now sees what has not yet been seen of the principles of the truths, so it may be called the path of seeing. The intermediate seven cognitions now see what has already been seen; why are the seven cognitions also subsumed under the path of seeing?" Answer: "Because one's knowledge of the truths is not yet complete and they arise in the interim, they are also subsumed under the path of seeing."