俱舍論頌疏論本 4.102

4.102

去來世各三者，三世門也。謂過去、未來各有三世非得。若現在法，唯有過去、未來非得，無現在非得，以法現在是所得者必成就故，定無非得。舊云現在法有非得者，此翻謬矣。且過去法有過去非得者，或是法前、或是法後，此據非得與所不得法今時同在過去也。若過去法現在非得者，唯法後非得。若過去法未來非得者，據世橫望雖皆法後，若論起用先後，未來亦有過去法家法前非得也，准得說之。未來法家未來非得者，或法前、或法後，未來雖無前後次第，約性類別、約容起用說前後也。未來法家過去、現在非得者，唯法前非得也。現在法中過去非得者，唯法前非得也。現在法中未來非得，據世橫望雖皆法後，若約起用先後，未來亦有現在法家法前非得也。

"Of the past and future times, there are three each" is the section on the three times. Past and future each have non-possessions belonging to the three times. If a phenomenon is present, it has only past and future non-possession, and no present non-possession, because when a phenomenon is present, that which is possessed is necessarily attained, so there is definitely no non-possession. The old translation asserting that present phenomena have [present] non-possession is completely erroneous. Furthermore, when a past phenomenon has past non-possession, it is either prior to the phenomenon or posterior to the phenomenon; this is said in terms of non-possession and the unpossessed phenomenon being at the present moment both in the past. If a past phenomenon has present non-possession, it is solely posterior to the phenomenon. If a past phenomenon has future non-possession, viewed horizontally across the times it is entirely posterior to the phenomenon, yet in terms of the sequence of the occurrence of function, there is also non-possession prior to the phenomenon in the future for a past phenomenon, explained in accordance with possession. For a future phenomenon having future non-possession, it is either prior to or posterior to the phenomenon; although in the future there is no temporal sequence, anteriority and posteriority are stated in terms of categories of nature and capacity to occur in function. For a future phenomenon having past or present non-possession, it is solely non-possession prior to the phenomenon. Among present phenomena, past non-possession is solely prior to the phenomenon. For a present phenomenon having future non-possession, viewed horizontally across the times it is entirely posterior to the phenomenon, yet in terms of the sequence of the occurrence of function, there is also non-possession prior to the phenomenon in the future for a present phenomenon.