俱舍論頌疏論本 4.92

4.92

非所斷二種者，三斷門也。非所斷者，謂無漏法也。二種者，非所斷法上能得得通二種也，一修所斷、二非所斷。頌文窄故，唯標非所斷得。若依論文，三斷具明。故論云：「又見修所斷法，如其次第，有見修所斷得。非所斷法得有差別，謂此法得，總說有二（此正釋頌文也。有二者，修非二斷也）。」「別分別者，諸無漏法名非所斷（無漏者，道諦二滅也。無漏非見修所斷，名非所斷）。非擇滅得唯修所斷，及非聖道所證，擇滅得亦如是。」注曰：此是釋非所斷法得通修所斷也。非擇滅得隨所依判，唯修所斷。若非聖道所引得者，隨能證判，亦唯修斷，故言亦如是也。聖道所證擇滅之得及道諦得，唯非所斷（此文釋非所斷法得，通非斷也，謂聖道所引得隨能證判，若道諦得隨所得判故皆非斷也）。

"What is not to be abandoned has two kinds" is the section on the three categories of abandoning. "What is not to be abandoned" refers to uncontaminated phenomena. "Two kinds" means that the possessions of phenomena that are not to be abandoned encompass two kinds: first, to be abandoned by cultivation; second, not to be abandoned. Because the verse text is concise, it marks only the possession of what is not to be abandoned. If one follows the treatise text, the three categories of abandoning are fully explained. Thus the treatise states: "Moreover, phenomena to be abandoned by vision and by cultivation have, respectively, possessions to be abandoned by vision and by cultivation. For phenomena not to be abandoned there is a distinction in possession: of this phenomenon's possession, generally speaking, there are two (this directly explains the verse text; 'there are two' means the two: to be abandoned by cultivation and not to be abandoned)." "Differentiating them individually: all uncontaminated phenomena are called not to be abandoned (uncontaminated means the truth of the path and the two cessations; because uncontaminated phenomena are not to be abandoned by vision or by cultivation, they are called not to be abandoned). The possession of non-analytical cessation is solely to be abandoned by cultivation, and the possession of analytical cessation realized by a non-noble path is also like this." (Annotation: This explains how the possession of a phenomenon that is not to be abandoned encompasses what is to be abandoned by cultivation. The possession of non-analytical cessation is determined by its basis, and is solely to be abandoned by cultivation. If it is a possession produced by a non-noble path, it is determined by that which realizes it, and is also solely to be abandoned by cultivation; hence it says 'is also like this.') The possession of analytical cessation realized by a noble path and the possession of the truth of the path are solely not to be abandoned (this text explains that the possession of a phenomenon not to be abandoned encompasses what is not to be abandoned; that is, the possession produced by a noble path is determined by that which realizes it, while the possession of the truth of the path is determined by that which is possessed, so both are not to be abandoned).