十二門論宗致義記 1.14

1.14

第二、定其所破者，有師說云：此三論宗但破小乘及外道等遍計所執實我實法，不破大乘依他起性，以是幻有，非過失故。若此亦破，則是斷滅惡取空攝，非正法故。有說：三論一切皆破。設使大乘《瑜伽》等論所立依他，此中亦破，以諸緣生無不空故。若此不破，見不亡故，理非盡故。

Second, determining that which is refuted: some masters state that this Three Treatise tradition only refutes the real self and real dharmas fabricated as parikalpita by the Hīnayāna, non-Buddhists, and so on; it does not refute the paratantra nature of the Mahāyāna, because it is illusory existence and not a fault. If this were also refuted, it would be subsumed under nihilistic and wrongly grasped emptiness, and would not be the correct Dharma. Others state: the Three Treatises refute everything without exception. Even if it is the paratantra established in treatises such as the Yogācāra of the Mahāyāna, it is also refuted here, because among all conditionally arisen phenomena, there are none that are not empty. If this were not refuted, views would not perish, and the principle would not be exhaustively realised.