瑜伽論記 1.165

1.165

一云，眼識及心所同類，賴耶所變相分本質塵起，名同一所緣。心及心所各各別變影像不同，名不同一行相。行相義者，行謂見分，相即相分，行之相故名為行相，是依主釋，不應難言第八，無本如何說云同一所緣，用他第八所變諸相為本質故。

One states: The eye-consciousness and its mental factors arise from the same category of objective aspects transformed by the ālaya as their fundamental basis; this is called having 'the same cognitive object.' The mind and its mental factors each separately transform distinct subjective representations; this is called 'not the same mental representation.' As for the meaning of mental representation (ākāra): 'activity' (ākāra/行) refers to the perceiving aspect, and 'aspect' (nimitta/相) refers to the objective aspect; being the aspect of the activity, it is called 'mental representation'—this is a tatpuruṣa compound. One should not raise the objection: 'If the eighth consciousness lacks a fundamental basis, how can it be said to have the same cognitive object?' For it takes the various aspects transformed by another's eighth consciousness as its fundamental basis.