瑜伽論記 1.251

1.251

論說等，言分別所緣中，有相分別，若依對法攝三分別中，自性隨念二，以五識無自性、自性體等故。七分別中，任運分別即五識故；今此論中自性分別即是任運故；說有相，謂於先所受義唯攝隨念故；與彼論寬狹不同，或是與對法兩門俱同，先所受義則攝自性隨念分別，等流心位有相分別緣前率爾心住所受境故。基師判云：不如前解。

Where the treatise says "and so forth," under conceptualizing the objective support there is conceptualization with characteristics. If relying on the Abhidharmasamuccaya to subsume them under the three kinds of conceptualization, these are the two: intrinsic nature and recollection, because the five consciousnesses lack intrinsic nature, an essential nature of intrinsic nature, and so forth. Among the seven conceptualizations, spontaneous conceptualization is precisely the five consciousnesses; in this treatise, intrinsic nature conceptualization is precisely spontaneous; and saying "with characteristics" refers to what was previously experienced, subsuming only recollection. Thus, its scope differs from that treatise. Or, both categories may be identical with the Abhidharmasamuccaya: what was previously experienced then subsumes both intrinsic nature conceptualization and recollection conceptualization, because conceptualization with characteristics in the state of the outflowing mind takes as its object the realm experienced during the previous spontaneous mind's abiding. Master Ji judges, saying: This is not as good as the previous explanation.