瑜伽論記 11.21

11.21

又文意有違，何以為七者？此中明廣大，意在菩養以及物自求菩提，而取如來制多者，不然。所供養境故，法師同此。今大師依第二釋以多財為第一，財妙為第二，乃至純淨心第七。

Furthermore, the textual intention is contradicted: why should there be seven? Here, in explaining vastness, the intention lies in the offerings of practice and items seeking awakening for oneself; yet taking the Tathāgata and caitya is not correct, because they are the objects of offering. The Dharma Master agrees with this. Now the Great Master relies on the second interpretation: taking abundant wealth as the first, exquisite wealth as the second, and so on up to a pure mind as the seventh.