瑜伽論記 12.201

12.201

前中難意，十地菩薩一一皆修萬行，云何前說初地修檀二地持戒三地修定四地道品等耶？故論為通，如是所說後後住中支分功德非前前住一切都無然下品故不墮其數等者，前地雖修未成滿故所以不立，至後地滿方建立之。泰法師言：若依此菩薩十二住中所修功德性，初種姓住中亦具足有，然未成滿故未立餘十一住名。雖有此釋，不及前解。

In the first section, the meaning of the objection is: The bodhisattvas of the ten stages all cultivate the ten thousand practices; why was it previously stated that the first stage cultivates dāna, the second stage maintains śīla, the third stage cultivates samādhi, the fourth stage cultivates the limbs of awakening, and so forth? Therefore, the treatise resolves this by stating that such described constituent virtues of the subsequent dwellings are not completely lacking in the preceding dwellings, but because they are of inferior grade, they do not fall within the count, and so on. Although they are cultivated in the earlier stages, because they are not yet complete and perfected, they are not established there, and only upon reaching completion in the subsequent stages are they established. Master Tai said: If one relies on the nature of the virtues cultivated within these twelve dwellings of the bodhisattva, they are also fully present in the initial dwelling of gotra; however, because they are not yet complete and perfected, the names of the remaining eleven dwellings are not established. Although there is this explanation, it is not as good as the previous interpretation.