瑜伽論記 13.122

13.122

又準下文，若約現行不相離者，唯有七物眼身地大及以四塵，將知聲亦所執受，若爾，聲及三大賴耶不緣耶？答：如眼根所依唯有地大是堅牢性，非三大造故非根依，又此三必不現行，故眼根攝唯有七物，如眼等淚等雖是水大，四此水大等別從緣生，非與眼根一種類起，聲亦如是，以間斷故非賴耶境，景師補闕及備師解云：根依處通於五塵，以同時大中有耳性聲故，亦言據性成四大，一切處具四，但就事相，即有不具，理實同時四塵有生聲能，皆名有聲性。

Furthermore, according to the text below, if considered in terms of active manifestations that are inseparable, there are only seven entities: the eye, the body, the earth element, and the four dusts. From this, one would infer that sound is also appropriated. If so, does the ālaya not have sound and the three great elements as intentional objects? Answer: Just as the base of the eye faculty has only the earth element because it has the nature of solidity, and not the other three great elements because it is not made of them and thus they are not the base of the faculty; furthermore, these three are definitely not actively manifest, so what is subsumed under the eye faculty consists of only seven entities. Just as tears and the like of the eye are the water element, these water elements and so forth are generated separately from conditions and do not arise as the same category with the eye faculty. Sound is also like this: because it is intermittent, it is not an intentional object of the ālaya. Master Jing's Supplement and Master Bei's explanation say: The bases of the faculties extend through the five dusts, because sound of the nature of the ear is present in the concurrent great elements. It is also said that in terms of their nature forming the four great elements, the four are complete in all loci; it is only in terms of phenomenal characteristics that they are incomplete. In ultimate principle, the concurrent four dusts have the capacity to generate sound, so they are all called having the nature of sound.