瑜伽論記 13.129

13.129

述曰：不然。第八雖緣上器，然有親有疎，欲界者親由業滅緣，上界者疎不由業滅緣，第七既緣第八見分為我，所緣相業所招生，親相分者即欲界器，其我所即須隨我，我既欲界繫，所亦應然，故非他界緣使。

The explanation states: It is not so. Although the eighth takes the higher container as an intentional object, there is the direct and the indirect: that of the desire realm is direct, arising from karmic fruition; that of higher realms is indirect, not arising from karmic fruition. Since the seventh takes the seeing-aspect of the eighth as self, the mark-object produced and born of karma—the direct mark-aspect—is the container of the desire realm. What is 'mine' must follow the 'self'; since the self is bound to the desire realm, what belongs to it should also be so; therefore, it is not an anusaya directed toward another realm.