瑜伽論記 13.47

13.47

恐彼分別執為我者，即第四句，釋第二為起煩惱不說所以，凡夫二執未斷，二我之執恐生，二乘人我雖除法我猶在，恐其起此。我有二種：一、分別，二、俱生。俱生之我任運而生，分別之我因教方起，恐凡夫因教分別二我得生，二乘因緣分別法我得起，故不為說。

Regarding "lest they conceptually grasp it as a self": this is the fourth line, explaining the second reason why it is not taught, namely, out of fear of giving rise to afflictions. Ordinary beings have not yet severed the two graspings, and there is fear that the grasping of the two selves would arise; as for the two vehicles, although the self of the person has been removed, the self of phenomena still remains, and there is fear that they would give rise to this. The self is of two kinds: first, conceptually constructed; second, innate. The innate self arises spontaneously, whereas the conceptually constructed self arises only due to teachings. Fearing that ordinary beings would, because of the teachings, give rise to conceptually constructing the two selves, and that the two vehicles would, through conditions, give rise to conceptually constructing the self of phenomena, he therefore did not teach it.