瑜伽論記 13.62

13.62

論云：又六識身，無覆無記異熟所攝類不可得，是第三因者，言六識中雖有異熟，但一念生，或諸心間，前後一類異熟之性必不可得，前後一類異熟之性無有變易，可能執持是真異熟，今六識中異熟之心但一念生非無有間，既非一類是異熟生，不得稱言能執受。應立量云：六種轉識非真異熟生（宗），有間斷故（因），譬如風聲（喻），此量未明，應更別立：六種轉識無覆無記異熟一類既不可得不能執持身（宗），有間斷義故（因），喻等同前。或應立量云：六轉識中，異熟之心不能執受（宗），有間斷故（因），如風聲等（喻），其論異熟類不可得者，即是此中有間斷之因言也。即彼逐難，六識中異熟心是異熟生，非真異熟不能執持者。汝宗何故言不苦不樂受從異熟生，既異熟生應非執受。

The treatise says: "Furthermore, among the groups of six consciousnesses, a uniform class subsumed under uncontaminated-indeterminate maturation is not observed"—this is the third reason. This means that although there is maturation within the six consciousnesses, it arises only for a single thought-moment or is interrupted by various minds; an invariant class of maturation nature from prior to posterior can definitely never be found. An invariant class of maturation nature from prior to posterior that undergoes no alteration could possibly sustain [the body], being true maturation. Now, the retributive mind within the six consciousnesses arises only for a single thought-moment and is not uninterrupted; since it is not of an invariant class, being merely arisen from maturation, it cannot be called capable of appropriating. One should formulate the syllogism: 'The six evolving consciousnesses are not arisen from true maturation (thesis), because they are interrupted (reason), like wind and sound (example).' This syllogism not yet being fully clear, one should further formulate separately: 'Because an invariant class of uncontaminated-indeterminate maturation cannot be observed in the six evolving consciousnesses, they cannot sustain the body (thesis), because they have the meaning of being interrupted (reason), example etc. as before.' Alternatively, one should formulate the syllogism: 'Among the six evolving consciousnesses, the mind of maturation cannot appropriate (thesis), because it is interrupted (reason), like wind, sound, etc. (example).' That the treatise says 'a class of maturation is not observed' is precisely the word for the reason 'because they are interrupted' here. To pursue the objection against them: 'The retributive mind among the six consciousnesses is arisen from maturation, not true maturation, and cannot sustain [the body]. Why then does your school say that neither-painful-nor-pleasant feeling arises from maturation? Since it is arisen from maturation, it should not appropriate.'