瑜伽論記 13.8

13.8

言決擇者，決謂決斷，謂決他疑，亦可決謂決了，能自了解；擇謂簡擇，可謂簡擇是非。今此明是破非，故言決擇耶。見撥無真俗雖決非簡擇是非，疑雖簡擇是非而非決斷。言決以簡疑或，談擇以別耶見，前本地分直述義相，今重問答決疑擇要，故名決擇。舊云決定藏者，非也。彼言尼也摩，可言決定，既云毘尼生折耶？此言決擇，何得稱為決定。

Regarding 'viniścaya' (決擇, determination): 'jue' means decisive judgment, meaning resolving the doubts of others; it can also mean clear comprehension, being able to understand clearly oneself. 'Ze' means discerning selection, which can mean distinguishing right from wrong. Here, it clarifies the right and refutes the wrong; hence it is called 'viniścaya'. The [wrong] view denying the real and the conventional, though decisive, does not discern right from wrong; doubt, though discerning right from wrong, is not decisive judgment. 'Jue' is stated to exclude doubt and confusion; 'ze' is discussed to distinguish wrong views. The preceding Maulī Bhūmiḥ directly set forth the characteristics of the meanings; now it re-examines questions and answers to resolve doubts and select the essentials; hence it is called 'viniścaya'. The old translation 'Juedingzang' (Treasury of Determination) is incorrect. If their term were 'niyama', it could be called 'jueding'; but since it is called 'viniścaya'—which means 'jueze'—how could it be called 'jueding'?