瑜伽論記 13.89

13.89

第七相中，處無心定不應道理乃至識不離身故者，就十八部總有二類，其末經部薩婆多等，但立一種意識滅定中無，餘十七部立二種意識，今此論主正破無者，此有二義：一、違比量二違聖教，應立量云：入無心定應如捨命（宗），識離身故（因），猶如死屍（喻）。又違聖教，如文可知。

Regarding the seventh characteristic, that is, 'dwelling in mindless concentration is not reasonable, up to consciousness not departing from the body': among the eighteen schools there are altogether two categories. The later Sautrāntikas, the Sarvāstivādins, and so forth only assert a single mental consciousness, which is absent in the concentration of cessation; the remaining seventeen schools assert two kinds of mental consciousness. Now, this author directly refutes those who assert that it is absent. This has two points: first, it contradicts inference; second, it contradicts sacred scripture. One should formulate the syllogism: 'Entering mindless concentration should be like giving up life (thesis), because consciousness has departed from the body (reason), just like a corpse (example).' Furthermore, it contradicts sacred scripture, as can be known from the text.