瑜伽論記 14.11

14.11

若諸威儀路至名無記表業者，基等云：此如隨轉薩婆多義，云一分者，即威儀四塵工巧五塵中唯取身語故言一分，今大乘此通三性，今取無記，除善不善，故言一分。此皆加行生，非如異熟生心不能發業。若爾，變化心亦能發業，何故不論？今大乘若為利樂當知是善則善種類。若為嬉戲當知無記即威儀等種類，略而不論。

Regarding the passage from "If all tracks of deportment..." up to "is called indeterminate manifest action": Ji and others say: This conforms to the Sarvāstivāda doctrine. Saying "one part" means: among the four sensory data of deportment and the five sensory data of arts and crafts, only body and speech are taken; hence it says "one part." Now in the Mahāyāna, this applies to the three natures; here indeterminate is taken, excluding wholesome and unwholesome, hence it says "one part." These are all arisen from preparation, unlike mind born of karmic maturation which cannot initiate action. If so, minds of magical transformation can also initiate action, so why are they not discussed? Now in Mahāyāna: if it is for benefit and joy, one should know it is wholesome and thus belongs to the category of the wholesome; if it is for amusement, one should know it is indeterminate and thus belongs to the category of deportment and the like, so it is omitted and not discussed.