瑜伽論記 15.224

15.224

是曾習故者，無分別智後得名曾習，又此緣事無相無分別智曾習，雖是有漏種類同故，有漏心相執之所引所以，遂令後得智亦有相，乃至廣說。又解：純世間道是有漏智無能斷煩惱。若爾，何故此中來有何意也？此中但簡後得智不斷惑所以，非有漏智也。

"Because it was previously practiced": what is attained subsequent to non-conceptual cognition is called "previously practiced"; furthermore, this non-conceptual cognition that is signless with respect to phenomenal affairs was previously practiced; although tainted, because its kind is identical, it is induced by the attachment to signs of the tainted mind, which consequently causes the subsequent attained cognition to also possess signs, and so on in detail. Another interpretation: a purely worldly path is tainted cognition and is incapable of severing defilements. If so, why is it introduced here and with what intention? Here it merely excludes the reason why subsequent attained cognition does not sever afflictions; it is not [referring to] tainted cognition.