瑜伽論記 15.30

15.30

第七明率爾尋求決定三心，前後同類，此中問意，謂諸心所是不相應之餘蘊也，此法為率爾心起，乃至決定心時起。答云：隨心即起，此中何故準言前三心不言第四五，一一思準亦在問中。又前心性定唯無記，遍行別境不定，四通三性或有得俱起餘善煩惱等，若起善惡心必與此法俱，此義決定，其遍行等不唯一性決定故。此中唯問此故，故唯問前三心不得後二。

Seventh, it explains the three minds of instantaneous encounter, inquiry, and determination, which are homogeneous before and after. The meaning of the question here is: all mental factors are the remaining aggregates that are not non-conjoined; do these dharmas arise at the time of the mind of instantaneous encounter, up to the mind of determination? The answer states: they arise according to the mind. Why here are only the first three minds referred to, and not the fourth and fifth? The reflection on each is also within the question. Furthermore, the nature of the preceding mind is definitively only indeterminate; omnipresent and object-determining factors are undetermined: four pervade the three natures, or some can co-arise with other wholesome and afflicted factors. If wholesome or unwholesome minds arise, they must be accompanied by these dharmas; this principle is definite. Because omnipresent and other factors are not determined to only one nature, here only this is asked, and therefore only the first three minds are asked about, not the latter two.