瑜伽論記 15.35

15.35

又善惡無記所作等，景云：何故不辨行相等耶？解云：大乘中辨行相不得言等，所以者何？行是見分，相是相分，謂心心所取前境時見分行解種種不同，依此見分所變相分眾多差別，故不得言行相應等。

Furthermore, wholesome, unwholesome, and indeterminate functions are equal. Jing says: "Why is equality of cognitive aspect (ākāra) not distinguished? The explanation is: in the Mahāyāna, when distinguishing cognitive aspects, one cannot say they are equal. Why? Cognitive aspect is the seeing part (darśanabhāga), and aspect is the object part (nimittabhāga); that is, when mind and mental factors grasp the preceding object, the cognitive understanding of the seeing part differs in various ways, and the object parts transformed on the basis of this seeing part have numerous distinctions; therefore, one cannot say that cognitive aspects are conjoined and equal."