瑜伽論記 16.160

16.160

景、備同云：且據一分名緣欲境，理實通緣漏無漏境。泰、基同云：從多為語，又以影像相分，從見分是欲界故。餘言通緣三界不繫者，此據本質為論無相違也。

Jing and Bei both say: This is said tentatively in terms of one portion as having desire realm objects, but in actual reality it generally takes both tainted and taintless objects as its object. Tai and Ji both say: It is spoken from the perspective of the majority; furthermore, in terms of the imaged aspect, following the seeing aspect, it belongs to the desire realm. The other statement that it generally takes what is bound to the three realms and unbound as its object is discussed in terms of the fundamental archetype; hence there is no contradiction.