瑜伽論記 16.479

16.479

基云：問此卷初云遍常論一分常論等，皆是邊見即計梵王為常，如何此中乃言邪見？答：二說，若起我見計梵王為我後計為常，此常見我起後生故邊見收如前。又此中約非我見後生者，此非常見故邪見收，亦無違。

Ji says: Question: At the beginning of this fascicle it was said that universal eternalism, partial eternalism, etc., are all extreme views—that is, conceiving Brahmā to be permanent; how is it that here it is spoken of as wrong view? Answer: There are two explanations. If one gives rise to a view of self conceiving Brahmā as a self and subsequently conceives him as permanent, this view of permanence arises after the view of self arises, and so it is subsumed under extreme view as before. Moreover, here it concerns that which does not arise after the view of self; this is not a view of permanence and so is subsumed under wrong view, and there is also no contradiction.