瑜伽論記 18.454

18.454

言或成就色界繫，非欲界繫；謂生色界者，若依薩婆多身生上界，亦成就四禪欲界化心相應愛。然今大乘四禪欲界化心是四禪繫非欲界繫，是故身生色界不成欲界不成欲界受。此約現自在兩成熟而作是說。若約種子成熟亦有成義，若爾九種命終時云何身在上界，起欲界煩惱相應受耶？

As for the statement 'or having accomplished [attachment] bound to the form realm, but not bound to the desire realm; referring to being born in the form realm': if based on the Sarvāstivāda, when the body is born in the higher realm, it also accomplishes the craving associated with the transformative mind of the desire realm in the four dhyānas. However, now in the Mahāyāna, the transformative mind of the desire realm in the four dhyānas is bound to the four dhyānas, not bound to the desire realm; therefore, when the body is born in the form realm, it does not accomplish feeling bound to the desire realm. This is stated with reference to both manifest activity and mastery as maturation. If stated with reference to the maturation of seeds, it can also be said to be accomplished. If so, at the time of the nine kinds of death, how could the body be in the higher realm and give rise to feeling associated with defilements of the desire realm?