瑜伽論記 19.227

19.227

備云：此中言真如實勝義攝故，若爾何故對法云：一切皆是假有耶？此有兩解，一云一切有二，彼論約少分，不約一切一切，故無相違，二云真如二義。今約實義，彼談假義門所以無違。

Bei says: Here it says that tathatā is real because it is subsumed under ultimate truth. If so, why does the Abhidharmasamuccaya say that all things are conventional existents? There are two explanations for this. The first says that ‘all’ has two senses: that treatise refers to a minor portion, not to all of all; hence there is no contradiction. The second says that tathatā has two meanings: here it is treated according to its real meaning, while there it discusses the approach of conventional meaning; therefore there is no contradiction.