瑜伽論記 19.372

19.372

備云：答中有二。一答前問，云不可言名亦即入不可言中，故云已遮；二答後問，為令覺知不可言義故設喻言，欲辨假名諸法雖非遍計性有。然離言說性依他真實非不是有，故非不相似。

Bei says: In the answer there are two parts. First, it answers the previous question, saying that the name 'ineffable' is also subsumed under the ineffable, hence it says 'already negated.' Second, it answers the latter question: in order to cause one to become aware of the ineffable meaning, words of simile were formulated; wishing to distinguish that although all conventionally named phenomena do not exist as parikalpita nature, yet the ineffable nature of paratantra and pariniṣpanna is not nonexistent, therefore it is not unanalogous.