瑜伽論記 19.438

19.438

又依佛性論及瑜伽論，以三性與五法相攝中，真實性與五法中真如相攝，若遣真實性得無真實名真實無性性者，真實無性性者，五法中何法攝耶？若云真如攝者，與真實性不異，若言五法不攝者，五法攝法不盡，若言五法攝不盡者，何故瑜伽論云：問：如是五事為攝一切法為不如是？答：如是。

Furthermore, relying on the Foxing lun and the Yogācārabhūmiśāstra, in the mutual subsumption of the three natures and the five dharmas, the real nature is subsumed under tathatā among the five dharmas. If eliminating the real nature yields the absence of reality and is called the nature of the real non-nature, under which of the five dharmas is the nature of the real non-nature subsumed? If one says it is subsumed under tathatā, it is not distinct from the real nature; if one says it is not subsumed under the five dharmas, then the five dharmas do not exhaustively subsume all dharmas. If one says the five dharmas do not exhaustively subsume them, why does the Yogācārabhūmiśāstra state: 'Question: Do these five matters subsume all dharmas or do they not? Answer: They do.'?